We are our memories

I’ve been reflecting lately. Mainly about the death of my dad, how much I miss him, and how my memories of growing up shaped me. This is all intertwined with the landscape that I grew up in. So today I want to show how Scotland’s landscape has, through memories and experiences, shaped what I search for in all my photographic work.

A few years back, I was honoured to be asked to write an introduction to Julian Calverley’s fine landscape book North Northwest. I’ve been thinking lately about the entry I wrote for him, which I reproduce here:

Landscape as Metaphor

As a seven year old child, I had not yet developed the capacity to remember place
names or to even think of the landscape as anything but the ground I stood on and
the earth I would play in.

Although landscape as metaphor as a deeply routed concept would not become part
of my psyche until much later; the Scottish climate, and in particular the tonal palettes
of dark autumns and wet winter days, already had. Each year, my father would drive
us north into the highlands. As we travelled by car, the landscape would morph from
being one of towns and populous places to vast areas of stark beauty.

The weather and climate would appear to conspire to change to fit the landscape,
becoming more menacing and dramatic, almost as a response to the beauty of these
empty wild places. I had never thought that my past would play such an important
role in my photography until I saw Julian’s pictures. His world is one of dark tones and
muted greys and browns that resonate with my upbringing. He thrives on working in
a tonal palette that many would not. As a result, I see and remember the countless
days of my growing up in his emotive imagery.

Stac Pollaidh, Inverpolly, Scotland October 2021. Image © Bruce Percy

I’ve been wondering how much of my relationship with the landscape has been shaped by my roots? I would say these days that I’m immensely proud of my Scottish background, and feel that the atmospheres, the weather, and growing up in a sometimes ‘dark land’ has had a profound influence on what I’m drawn to.

It may come as a surprise that I think this, because I haven’t really made any serious effort to photograph Scotland in well over a decade now. But I would like to point out that I think I have been chasing the spirit of the Scottish landscape elsewhere.

Let me explain if I can: you have to leave sometimes, in order to return, because there is a lot to be learned in the parting, and similarly, a lot to be learned in the returning.

In all relationships, parting for a while has a lot to teach us about how we feel about the relationship. Having time apart allows one to gain objectivity about what is important in the relationship. Coming back is always the time when we know just how we really feel about the relationship.

So that is how I feel about Scotland. I spent the first decade of my photographic life making all my photographs here. But I didn’t think I had enough objectivity to really appreciate the landscape. It was my ‘norm’, and as all ‘norm’s go, you can’t see them for what they are if you are staring at them all the time.

I have found that as I’ve continued to travel abroad, it provided context, and contrast. Going somewhere quite different from what you know, makes one realise just how special or unique a familiar landscape can be. But I also think that going somewhere quite different allows one to notice similarities as well.

Particularly the similarities. They seem to indicate to me that I’ve been ‘chasing Scotland’ elsewhere. I seem to be drawn typically to landscapes that have a lot in common, at least weather wise, and perhaps tonally as well.

I haven't done much travelling for obvious reasons for around 20 months now, and I’ve found this has been a form of ‘returning’. As I’ve started to reconnect with my homeland, I’ve come to acknowledge that my past, my upbringing, and living in a Scottish climate has had massive impact on what I’m drawn to.

Last December I lost my dad. I was very close to him, and we had a terrific relationship where he often told me that we were more like buddies than father and son. He was a highlander. From Sutherland with that Highland lilt and clear pronunciation of accent. As the months since his death have progressed, I’ve found myself reflecting about our time together, and how in fact, every thing we experience is transitory, and to be cherished. I think that a parent’s death is a rite of passage for many of us. It brings on time for reflection, for understanding who we are, and where we are in life. And I found myself realising that this awareness of my Scottish roots has been surfacing for some time. As is evident in my foreword to Julian’s book.

In the foreword, I wrote about my childhood. And although it is not explicitly stated, I was describing Glencoe. I have very strong memories of how Glencoe was this foreboding landscape that I didn’t know the name of, but was so memorable because it had a mood and an atmosphere like no other.

I know my family holidays into the highlands shaped me. I know that when I go to Patagonia or Iceland, I am working with what Scotland taught me about mood and character. The Scottish landscape, it seems, has been at the basis of everything I’ve been shooting in one way or another. Except I have only been able to realise this by reflecting upon my time with my dad, my childhood, and of course, by spending time apart from it.

Harris deep green

I love inclement weather, and often shoot in the rain, but there is a limit to what my camera, and myself can handle.

When I was on the isle of Harris a year past October (2020), I had one day where the weather was so rough and dark, that it was almost impossible to make any photographs. But I was keen to pursue working in such bad weather because I have been thinking for a while, that there is a mood and an atmosphere to this kind of work that is seldom explored.

Contast, and the lack of, can be a positive tool to own in your photographic vocabulary. I’ve been exploring tonal response and relationships now for about a decade, and I think that low contrast, is often underused. Most of us tend to go for the higher contrast look because it appears to be striking. Good images in my view, often contain low contrasts as well as high contrasts. If the entire picture contains only high contrasts, then I think it becomes fatiguing to look at. Everything is too loud, everything is vying for our attention.

Low contrast work on the other hand, can be too quiet, too boring, and covey a sense of disinterest. There has to be some kind of ‘contrast within the contrasts’ used in a picture.

Right now, I’m really interested in exploring the darker moods of Scotland’s landscape. I’ve lived here all my life and even as a young boy, I was aware of the low-mood days, and how the landscape can feel as though the it’s the end of the world today. It’s just part of the highlands moods I think. And I’ve not really explored that avenue much at all.

But I think this photo made a year ago, has this quality to it. Just by looking at it, I can feel as though it’s a bad stormy day, with very low light. And it conveys a side to Harris that isn’t often photographed. I’d like to explore this some more over the coming year or so.

Forewords

I’ve been meaning to write for the past few months about two books I have been ‘distantly involved with’.

Around April this year Anthony Lamb asked me if I would write an intro to his book. I had known of Anthony’s work for about a year, as I had been researching Dubai as a photographic destination and I loved his images.

About a month later, Hans Strand asked me to write an intro to his new book as well. Wow. I seemed to be very popular last April I thought !

Then in the summer the publisher Kozu books got in touch with me to tell me that they were printing both books. So I just want to be clear that this all came around organically, and I don’t even know if Kozu knew that both photographers had asked me to write an intro to their books.

Sand - by Anthony Lamb

Anthony Lamb has been making intriguing images of the Dubai desert, and his book (which I now have a beautiful copy of), is really nicely printed by Kozu books.

I found the roads seemingly going to nowhere intriguing. And it was really refreshing for me to see a desert that hasn’t been photographed much done really well. There is a hue and softness of palette to Anthony’s work.

More info about the book can be found here: https://www.kozubooks.com/books-new/sand-by-anthony-lamb


Beyond Landscape by Hans Strand

The second book is by Hans Strand. I’ve been a long time admirer of Strand’s photographs from Iceland. In my view, Strand deftly intermixes close up landscapes with aerial shots. Whilst looking at the work in his book, I was aware that there is an intentional ambiguity in the work. A shot that I may think is from overhead may actually be a macro section of a stream, when I thought it might be a massive sea. He understands texture and the graphic.

Hans’ book is also available from Kozu books: https://www.kozubooks.com/books-new/beyond-landscape-by-hans-strand.

-

I’d just like to finish today’s post by saying how honoured I was to contribute to these fine books. I love photographic books and I encourage keen photographers to buy as many monographs as they can. You can immerse yourself in another world with a book in a way that isn’t possible by staring at a website.

Being the producer of photographic books, I am a strong advocate that photographers should publish their work in book format.

In my view, images are never finished until they’re printed.

Congrats to Anthony and Hans for two very fine books.

The Scottish Landscape

It’s been a while.

I haven’t photographed Scotland with any particular ‘focus’ in a long, long while.

It’s not because I didn’t care for it. It’s just that I had spent over a decade in my more formative years of my photographic life making pictures in Scotland. I had found that certain landscapes like the Bolivian altiplano, the pampas of Patagonia, and the Icelandic landscape offered me ground to grow and learn.

I’ve learned a tonne from visiting these places. Bolivia was perhaps my first introduction to working on reducing down my compositions into something more distilled, simple. Iceland taught me about extreme tonality and working with not just the much darker registers of tonality, but also the more hi-key range of tones as well. Hokkaido was more like a concentrated on building on top of what I’d learned elsewhere.

I had no space in my life for the Scottish landscape. Because when I returned home from all the travelling I did: I rarely had any energy left in my batteries to go out and work here in my own back yard. Until now.

But before you think I just wasn’t interested in the Scottish landscape, it’s really not that at all. I assure you. I’ve been hankering the thoughts of working on a set of images of Scotland for a book at some point. The desire was there, but the free time to do it was not.

I was also a little apprehensive. The Scottish landscape is complex. There’s a lot going on, and I feel I’ve become extremely spoiled in going to landscapes where they are more quantised down, more reduced and more simple to work with. I wasn’t sure if I could approach the terribly busy landscape of Scotland with my style of photography. How would it work? Have I changed enough and learned enough elsewhere to know what to do?

Well, I love asking myself these kinds of questions. One of my participants on a recent workshop told me ‘you’re probably very reflective about what you do’. Yes, that’s me. I tend to think and feel it. And I love noticing the connections and the growth.

To me, these six images from the Ullapool / Assynt / Inverpolly region this October allowed me to see that Hokkaido was still there. But so too was Iceland’s dark tones as well. And a distillation in composition has become so part of me now, that I think it’s just who I am.

As my good friend Steven Feinstein said to me when I met him on a workshop ‘Bruce, you seem to be able to go anywhere in the world, and make the same photographs!’. I took it as a compliment. I hope it was meant that way! But I think the more I work anywhere, I just see myself come through. And it’s nice to feel it’s come full circle. I’m back in Scotland, where this little journey of mine all began. And I’m loving it so far.

It's freeing to throw it all away

Have you ever been working on something that you start to tire of? Perhaps you’ve begun to really hate a photograph that you’ve spent hours, days or weeks editing? Or a location you went to and found out it wasn’t working for you? Try as you might, you can’t quite get the composition to work.

The solution, is to abandon the work. Throw the pursuit of it away.

I’ve found that when something isn’t working, it’s usually due to:

a) being tired, and therefore unable to be receptive to it.

b) it isn’t a very good idea.

Often it is b), more than a). And learning to recognise that the idea you’re frustrated with, isn’t going anywhere is a skill that we all have to work on. Knowing when to hit the eject button, or discard an idea, particularly when you have invested so much time in it, is hard.

But when I do abandon something, I often find that it is liberating. I becoming ‘unstuck’.

Spending too much time with the wrong company means you aren’t spending time with the right company. Similarly, spending time in the wrong job means you aren’t spending time in the right job. Same for photography and for creativity in general. If it’s not working: leave it.

Because when you do, you open yourself up to the opportunity to find something that does work. I know this because there have been many times when I have realised that the idea I’m working on has no future. Even if I’m unsure of whether it has no future or not, by simply walking away from it, I have often found that this gives me the chance to find something that does work.

The composition I felt wasn’t working, If I stayed put and persevered with it: I wasted time on something that was going nowhere. By walking away, I have often been very pleasantly surprised to find something wonderful to photograph only a few feet away.

So if there is one bit of advice from this short post today, it is this: keep moving. If you get stuck, take that as a hint that something isn’t working. By moving onto something else, you give yourself the best opportunity to become unstuck.

Creativity is all about keeping things fluid. To do that, you need to become less precious about what you do. That means being willing to radically change it. Abandonment of the work can either mean ‘throwing it all away’, or simply ‘redoing a lot of what you’ve already done’. Nothing is permanent, and accepting that impermanence is part of our work can be extremely freeing and liberating.

Subject separation

I am a big believer in buying the tallest tripod I can. I now own a Gitzo Series 3 XLS, a Series 4, and also a mammoth 9ft tall series 5 Gitzo. I have always used the full range of height of each of these tripods, because sometimes the best shot is much higher than I am, or in many circumstances, when the tripod is on a slope or a tight area, I need to extend the leg way lower than where I am standing.

But sometimes no tripod height can help, and I’m seeking something that will allow me to get much higher.

In order to shoot this:

I had to do this:

If I hadn’t doe this, the background row of trees would have crashed into the foreground group of trees. This is the only time I have been on the roof of a car to make a photograph (or do anything at all!), but it does illustrate the point that sometimes, cameras need to be much higher than we are.

So I do recommend a really tall tripod. I have an old blog posting about it here: https://www.brucepercy.co.uk/blog/2017/9/24/gitzo-giant-tripod

Biblioscapes Interview

Euan Ross, from the most excellent Biblioscapes podcast interviewed me about my book ‘The Sound of Snow’. I hope you enjoy it.

Check out Euan’s podcast. He has interviewed many fine photographers.

When to know you're being complimented

I don’t take compliments very well. There’s something in my upbringing, or perhaps in being Scottish, that prevents me from glowing in any form of adulation. It is something I personally abhor - anyone seeking kudos of any kind in my book, needs to be avoided. Because those that are genuine, do whatever it is they do, because they can’t not do it. You don’t do something for praise or reward, you just do it because it’s part of who. you. are.

I don’t wish to be anyone else either. I just think the best thing we can all do is be ourselves. Sounds easy, but how many folks do you think you know who are busy trying to ‘not’ be themselves? Trying to find something else that is far removed from where they are?

Fjallabak-Sept-2017-(12).jpg

As I’ve grown older, I’ve come to realise that my past is so important to me. The friends I have, some of them since I was at high School, are so important to me, because we share something that cannot be bought at any price: memories, a past, a sense of ‘where we come from’.

This week I was in Iceland, and I bumped into Daniel Bergmann. He’s a well known Icelandic photographer. Daniel has worked as a photographic guide for a long list of well known landscape photographers over the past few decades. And I have a tendency to bump into him when I am out in the landscape.

Compliments, if they are genuine, tend to come at you when you least expect them.

I was sitting in the Highland centre, just off the F26 highland road when Daniel said ‘we should award you honorary Icelandic membership’. I hadn’t been fishing for a complement, but it meant a lot to me when he said it.

I have never wanted to be anyone else but me, and I am extremely proud of being Scottish. As I’ve grown older I have realised that my roots, my past, and my parent’s Scottish highland roots are very important to me. My parents are from Sutherland. I feel more Scottish now than I did when I was younger (I think that finding importance in our past and roots becomes more important as we get older).

But I do love Iceland, and I have found some kind of aesthetic affinity with the landscape there. So when Daniel gave me his complement, it stayed.

I think he sees me as someone who has been working the Icelandic landscape for a long while. It has been 17 years since i first went to Iceland. My relationship with the landscape has grown over the years and the country has had a lot to teach me about luminosity, tone, blacks, whites, and how weather is so important in working within the landscape.

Iceland’s landscape is not too distant from Scotland’s, but it can be more stark, more wild, more raw perhaps. Scotland’s landscape is an old one which has been worn down over the millennia, while Iceland’s is still a relatively new one. When we look around Iceland, we are able to glimpse how most of Earth looked at the beginning of creation.

But somehow, In my heart, Scotland and Iceland are inseparable brothers. They share an overlap, or subset, of weather, geology and beauty.

In any event, what Daniel said left an impression upon me.

So thank you Daniel. Thank you very much.

Assynt February 2022 Workshop

I’ve just set up a second workshop for Assynt (north west region of the Scottish Highlands) for February 2022.

This is one of my own personal favourite locations in Scotland, and February can often be one of the coldest months in Scotland. So there’s a good chance of finding snow on the mountains around this region, as well as interesting winter light.

Assynt & Inverpolly, Scottish Highlands
£688.50

Price: £2,395
Initial deposit: £688.5
2nd Deposit of £688.5 due six months before tour start date

5-Day Photographic Workshop

Date: March 2 - 7, 2026

Introduction

In the far north west lies some of the most distinctive mountains of Scotland. Stac Pollaidh, Suilven, Canisp and Cul Mor dominate the landscape, yet there is an abundance of wide open space. This is real highland countryside with some dramatic coastal scenery to boot.

Postpone another year?

I bet you’re keen to go travelling with your camera.

I’m just wondering if you’re one of the many who are thinking ‘give it another year, and things will all be back to normal’.

My view is that things aren’t going to go back to normal any time soon. Not in the next five years at least. My reasoning is that I’ve noticed a trend. We’ve all been thinking ‘give it a few more months, and things will be better’ since this all started 18 months ago. It’s a constantly shifting time-line with no end in sight.

So my view is: if you are going to keep postponing until everything is more reliable, less uncertain, you may be squandering valuable years of your life. I’d suggest just trying your best to get out there, and go travelling.

Since August, I’ve been to Iceland twice. I am there right now. Apart from the red-tape (more an effort in my view to be seen to be doing something, with a dash of politics thrown in), I’m here. I’m having a good time. And no, I’m not going to die from Covid, and I’ve probably got a lot less chance of catching it in the wilderness of Iceland’s landscape, than I do frequenting the supermarkets of my home town in Scotland.

But that isn’t the reason why most of us aren’t travelling. It’s the uncertainty of the rules that are stopping most of us. That we could get stuck somewhere. Or even catch covid and have to go into quarantine in a foreign town.

Heaven forbid.

Well my thoughts are: I’d much rather take that chance, than sit at home doing nothing for the next few years of my life.

So are you up for postponing for another year?

I hope not. Because very little is going to change.

Best to get out there. Now. Even do something in your own country is better than not going at all.

All we ever have is the present moment. The past is gone, and any control we have over the future is just an illusion.